Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

ROHTASH vs BAHADUR AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
RSA 3973/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ROHTASH
Respondent
BAHADUR AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 109 RSA-3973-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision.:05.05.2026 Rohtash …..Appellant Vs. Bahadur and Others .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate with Mr. Deepanshu Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) CM-14188-C-2023: This is an applicaon under Secon 5 of the Limitaon Act to condone the delay of 8 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons menoned in the applicaon duly supported by affidavit of the appellant Rohtash, delay of 8 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. Applicaon stands disposed of accordingly. Main case: The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellants–defendants against the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Sirsa dated 01.11.2017 and the learned District Judge, Sirsa dated 19.08.2023, whereby the suit instuted by the respondents–plainffs for declaraon and permanent injuncon, claiming a right of passage by way of easement of necessity, has been decreed and the findings of the Trial Court have been affirmed in appeal. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.05.07 16:27 I attest