ROHIT vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 CRM-M-26241-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.05.2026 Rohit ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Garg, AAG Haryana Mr. P.K. Sehrawat, Advocate for the complainant ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that an altercation took place between the petitioner and the aunt of the complainant and thereafter, a compromise (Annexure P-2) dated 08.03.2026 had been effected; the petitioner has no concern with deceased Ravi Kumar who died having consumed some poisonous substance. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are vague. There is no instance of an act, immediately preceding the alleged suicide, which would have made his case fall within the definition of abetment as defined under Section 45 BNS, so as to constitute the offence under Section 108 BNS. He is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG, Hary