Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-14

ROHIT SINGH RANA vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-2718/2025 2026:DHC:4362
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ROHIT SINGH RANA
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14th May, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2718/2025 ROHIT SINGH RANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Mr. Sachin Singh Shahi, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Vikram Paul. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner herein seeks quashing of FIR No.0180/2025 dated 21.02.2025, registered at Police Station Pahar Ganj, for commission of offence under Section 376 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of voluntarily compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The FIR in question was registered on 21.02.2025 on the basis of complaint made by prosecutrix. 3. She revealed in her such complaint that she became friend with petitioner through Instagram in June, 2022. Thereafter, they exchanged their numbers and started talking and liking each other. They remained in long-distance relationship but on 11.06.2023, the petitioner forcibly made physical relation with her, while promising that he would marry her. However, he, thereafter, started ignoring her and since she apprehended that he was in a relationship with someone else, the matter was reported to the Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2718/2025 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:16.05.2026 11:43:09 police which resulted in registration of the abovesaid FIR. 4. Copy of statement made by her under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (corresponding Section 164 Cr.P.C.) has also been shown in which she had claimed that they were in relationship and there was also a sexual relationship between them. She did not claim about the physical rel

ROHIT SINGH RANA vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. · Niyam