ROHIT NEGI vs STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 16.05.2026 + CRL.M.C. 2302/2026 ROHIT NEGI .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given) with petitioner in person (through videoconferencing). versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State (through videoconferencing) with SI Rahul, PS Safdarjung Enclave. Respondent no.2 in person (through videoconferencing). CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 0006/2024 of Police Station Vasant Kunj, South for offence under Section 498/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. CRL.M.C. 2302/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.16 06:06:59 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:16.05.2026 18:21:43 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. 3. The respondent no.2, present through videoconferencing, is identified by IO/SI Rahul. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. Presently, there is no surviving child of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits t