Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

ROHIT JAIN vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 25136/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ROHIT JAIN
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103+204 CRM-M-25136-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.05.2026 ROHIT JAIN ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vardaan Seth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. DS Sobti, Advocate for the complainant. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.129, dated 31.07.2025, under Section 420 IPC (318 BNS) registered at Police Station Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana. 2. On 06.05.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- “Learned Senior Counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case by his own cousin Saurabh Jain, who is the complainant. It is a property dispute between the extended family. The document in question does not bear the signatures of the petitioner or members of the complainant family. The essential ingredients of Section 420 IPC are not made out. A civil suit already stands filed at the hands of the complainant, which is pe