Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-01

ROHIT AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 60364/2024
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ROHIT AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-60364-2024 Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 ROHIT AND ANOTHER ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Dharamvir Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Athar Ahmed, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the complainant. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Yadav, Advocate has filed ‘vakalatnama’ on behalf of the complainant and the same is taken on record. As 04 of the 25 prosecution witnesses stand examined, the learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds raised in the present petition before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE May 01, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.05.01 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document