ROHINI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5549-2026 Date of decision: 11.05.2026 Rohini and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Ms. Divya Narula, Advocate for the petitioners (through V.C.) Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG Haryana **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to provide protection of lives and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of the private respondents. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file fresh one by explaining the complete and all relevant facts, alongwith the supporting documents, as to since when both the petitioners are residing in Sirsa (State of Haryana). 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. 11.05.2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) reena JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned: Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No REENA 2026.05.12 06:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigar