Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

RITU vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 9615/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RITU
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP No.9615 of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.113 CWP No.9615 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 Ritu .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 06.01.2024, Annexure P-19, whereby the petitioner’s services as Extension Lecturer in Zoology have been dispensed with on account of being ineligible, as also the order dated 21.01.2026, Annexure P-24, whereby her claim for re-adjustment as Extension Lecturer has been rejected in terms of the policy guidelines dated 04.03.2020, on the ground that ineligible Extension Lecturer is not entitled to seek re-adjustment in service. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was awarded M.Phil degree in Zoology on 31.12.2008, which made her eligible for appointment as Assistant Professor without qualification of Ph.D or National Eligibility Test (NET) in terms of the University Gr