RITIK vs STATE OF HARYANA

107 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-25329 of 2026 Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 Ritik ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Renu Bala Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.404 dated 06.11.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 2, 9, 39, 50, 51 and 55 of ‘the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972’, Police Station Kunjpura, District Karnal, Haryana. 2. Vide order dated 07.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. Heard. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.05.15 19:57 in compliance wi