RISHI RAJ vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-17839-2026 -1- (219) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17839-2026 Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 RISHI RAJ ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sakal Sikri, Advocate Ms. Kushaldeep K. Manchanda, Advocate Mr. VPS Mithewal, Advocate and Mr. Siddhanth Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.43 dated 28.11.2022 registered under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC read with Sections 13(1)(C), 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act at Police Station ACB, Gurugram, Haryana. 2. As per the allegations, the petitioner purchased a plot from HUDA in the year 1997 but on account of non-payment of instalments, the plots stood resumed. Despite resumption of the same, he gave a GPA to one JITESH LAL 2026.05.12 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-17839-2026 -2- V.K. Goyal who got the same re-allotted to himself (V.K. Goy