Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

RINKU vs STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 15267/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RINKU
Respondent
STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (124) CWP-15267-2026 Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 Rinku --Petitioner Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA. Present:- Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr. Shashank Shekhar Sharma, Jr. Standing Counsel for U.T., Chandigarh. *** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA.J (Oral) 1. Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to file a petition afresh on the same cause of action with better particulars. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. 18.05.2026 (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) lucky JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No LUCKY 2026.05.19 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement High Court chandigarh