Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

RINKU vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 27222/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RINKU
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-27222-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 232 CRM-M-27222-2026 Date of decision: 19.05.2026 RINKU ......PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA . ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. 1. This petition for bail is the second petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. This petition has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.0278 dated 02.11.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 109(2), 121(1), 132, 221, 3(5), 308(4) [Section 308(4) deleted later on] of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’ and Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, 1959 VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.20 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-27222-2026 2 [Sections 25(1)(a) deleted and Section 25(1)(AB), 27(2) and 28 added later on], Police Station Dadri Sadar, District Charkhi Dadri. 2. The FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Mukesh’, hereinafter being referred to as “complainant” only. It was stated by the above- named c