Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

RINKU vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 19132/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RINKU
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-19132-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228 CRM-M-19132-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.05.2026 Rinku ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG Haryana assisted by ASI Naresh Kumar, PS Sadar Ambala City. Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. This petition for bail is the second petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.190 dated 06.08.2024, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 190 and 191(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Ambala Sadar, District Ambala. 2. The abovementioned FIR came into being at the instance of ‘Harjit Kaur’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by the above-named complainant that an altercation had taken place between her husband, namely ‘Dharam Pal’, and accused ‘Happy’ regarding some labour charges in Village Sarala, Punjab. According to complainant, in