RENU BALA AND ANOTHER vs BLOCK DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT OFFICER NARNAUL AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CWP-13972-2026 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 Renu Bala and another ....Petitioners Versus Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Narnaul and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate Mr. Akash Mehta, Advocate and Mr. Anshul Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate (through V.C) and Mr. Teginder Singh, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4-Bank. Mr. V.K.Sachdeva, Advocate (through V.C) and Mr. J.P.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Pursuant to the previous order dated 07.05.2026, counsel for the petitioners states that a Securitization Application (SA/253/2026) has been filed which is pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chandigarh (DRT). Counsel submits that proceedings before the DRT came up on 22.05.2026 but the matter could not be heard and has been deferred. Counsel submits that petitioners are the tenants in the secured asset and by virtue of a VARINDER PRASHAD 2026.05.30 14:17 I atte