Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

REKHA AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 2374/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
REKHA AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-2374-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110 CWP-2374-2026 Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 Rekha and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Monu Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, assisted by Mr. Harmanjit Singh Johal, Advocate. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioners, who have worked as Group-D employees, to resume work since they have been relieved from service in violation of the policy instructions, dated 07.08.2024 and 15.01.2025, Annexures P-9 and P-10, respectively. 2. Learned State counsel submitted that in case of similarly placed employees a statement was made on behalf of the Government by learned Advocate General that the orders dispensing with their services shall be withdrawn and they would be allowed to continue working till a fresh decision was taken. This is recorded in the order dated 24.12.2025, deciding CWP No.7437 of 2025 titled Renu and others v