RAVINDER SINGH vs REGOSHIN HEALTHCARE PVT LTD & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15th May, 2026 + CS(COMM) 383/2025 RAVINDER SINGH .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. and Ms. Anshima Puri, Advocates. versus REGOSHIN HEALTHCARE PVT LTD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Bhuvan Mishra, Mr. Tanmay Mishra, Mr. Yash Maheshawari, Mr. Krishna Kanhaiya Kumar and Mr. Bethshy Gangte, Advocates for D-1 and D-3. Mr. Rahul Kumar and Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT JYOTI SINGH, J. I.A. 21970/2025 (u/O 7 Rule 10 of CPC on behalf of Defendants No. 1 and 3 for return of Plaint) 1. This application is filed by Defendants No.1 and 3 seeking return of the plaint to be presented before the Court having territorial jurisdiction in the matter. 2. Present suit is instituted by the Plaintiff seeking inter alia decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising and/or directly or indirectly dealing in any product using the impugned trademarks / / and/or any other mark which is Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SAHIL SHARMA CS(COMM) 383/2025 Page 1 of 24 Signing Date:18.05.2026 18:25:10 deceptively similar to Plaintiff’s trademarks / , including the artistic work therein, in respect of dietary food supplements, pharmaceuticals, medicine, veterinary substances and preparations and other allied and cognate goods/services, amounting to infringement of trademarks/trade dress/copyright. 3. It is the case of Defendants No.1 and 3 that this Court lacks the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present suit which is essentially predicated on Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (‘1999 Act’) and Section 20(c) of Code of Civil Procedure, 19