RAVINDER SINGH vs M/S BALAJI ISPAT UDYOG THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NITIN GARG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 165 INCOMP-1101-2026 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 RAVINDER SINGH ...Petitioner(s) Versus M/S BALAJI ISPAT UDYOG THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NITIN GARG ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA **** Present: None for the petitioners. MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V of Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of 40 days. However, as per Registry, the present case has not been taken back for removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after removing the objection(s) so raised by the Registry. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE May 04, 2026 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2026.05.04 16.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document