RAVINDER KUMAR AND ORS vs UMED SINGH AND ORS

FAO-754-2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-754-2010 (O&M) RAVINDER KUMAR AND ANR. ......Appellants VS. UMED SINGH AND ORS. ......Respondents Reserved on:- 07.05.2026 Pronounced on:- 11.05.2026 Uploaded on: 14.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Chandarhas Yadav, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate and Mr. Pardeep Dhull, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 19.09.2009 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rewari (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellants/claimants to the tune of Rs.1,40,000/- along with interest @ 6 % per annum on account of death of deceased Smt. Shanti in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 09.01.2000. MOHD AYUB 2026.05.14 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity