RAVI @ SAHIL vs STATE OF HARYANA

On 06.05.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- “Learned counsel contends that name of the petitioner surfaced on the disclosure statement of co-accused Sudesh, from whom non-commercial quantity of contraband, it being 14.24 grams of heroin, was allegedly recovered. There is no recovery effected from the petitioner. Reliance is placed on the judgment passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Toofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2021 (1) RCR (Criminal) 1. He is not involved in any other case; ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 13.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.20 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating