Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-25

RATNESH KUMAR & ORS. vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-4155/2026 2026:DHC:4710
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RATNESH KUMAR & ORS.
Respondent
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 CRL.M.C. 4155/2026 & CRL.M.A. 16782/2026 RATNESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sukanya Hazarika and Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Mohit Malik, PS Vijay Vihar. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 251/2024 of PS Vijay Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners 2. Learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Mohit Malik accepts notice and submits that State has no objection to this petition. CRL.M.C. 4155/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965f 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by the IO. 4. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromise