Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

RASHEED vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 12723/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RASHEED
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-12723-2026 (O&M) 1 sonra IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12723-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 04.05.2026 RASHEED «+s PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .+s RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Sunil Sihag Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 by the petitioner seeking grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 127 dated 11.07.2014 under Sections 148 (121-A of BNS), 149 (122 of BNS), 323 (115(2) of BNS), 325 (117(2) of BNS), 365 (140(3) of BNS), 506 (351(2) of BNS) and 174-A (209 of BNS) of IPC, registered at Police Station Nagina, District Nuh. A perusal of the FIR reveals that it was registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 364, 506 and 174-A IPC, whereas the present regular bail petition has been filed mentioning Section 365 IPC instead of Section 364 IPC. Accordingly, the present bail petition shall be read as having been filed under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 364, 506 and 174-A IPC. POONAM NEGI 2026.05.05 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-12723-2026 (O&M) 2 2. The present F