Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

RASAL SINGH @ VICKY vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRWP 12979/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RASAL SINGH @ VICKY
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2026 PHHC-083390-DB 231 CRWP No.12979 of 2025 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 RASAL SINGH @ VICKY .-Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ..Respondent +e CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Ms. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Amardeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab. *? ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (Oral) Aggrieved by the rejection of parole, the convict has come up before this Court. Status report has been filed by the State Counsel is taken on record. The reason for rejection of parole has been mentioned in Annexure P-6. As per the same, the petitioner is a resident of village Daliri, which is situated close to the Pakistan Border and, in the event of his release on parole, there is apprehension of his involvement in drug dealing, which may lead to disruption of law and order and may pose a threat to the security of the State. A perusal of the rejection order does not reveal any reference to the inquiry conducted to ascertain the said apprehensions, nor does it record any supporting findings. Given above, order dated 04.11.2025 passed by the Deputy C