Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

RANO AND ANOTHER vs VARINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 1435/2024
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RANO AND ANOTHER
Respondent
VARINDER SINGH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CM-8830-CII-2026 in/and -1- FAO-1435-2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (120) CM-8830-CII-2026 in/and FAO-1435-2024 (O&M) Date of decision:- 05.05.2026 Rano and another ...Appellants Versus Varinder Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Chetan Goyal, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, and Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) CM-8830-CII-2026 Present application has been filed under Order 41 Rule 19 read with Section 151 CPC for restoration of the above-mentioned appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The order dated 12.03.2026 is recalled and the main appeal is restored to its original number. CM-5673-CII-2024 This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation NARESH KUMAR 2026.05.06 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CM-8830-CII-2026 in/and -2- FAO-1435-2024 (O&M) Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 418 days in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and