RANJIT SINGH vs FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS

APURVA 2026.05.15 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh APURVA 2026.05.15 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh APURVA 2026.05.15 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh APURVA 2026.05.15 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh Sr. Particulars Review Resp. No.6 No. Applicant/Petitioner (Vipin Kumar) (Ranjit Singh) 1. Age 22 years 32 years 2. Educational 10th Standard 5th Standard qualification 3. Land holding(s) 26 Kanal ---- 4. Recommended by ----- Lower Revenue Authorities 5. Hereditary Claim Grandson of ---- deceased Lambardar as a headman of the village. It is not the case of the review applicant/petitioner that respondent No.6 is incapacitated from discharging the functions of a Lambardar, in view of his more age. There is nothing on record suggestive of the fact that any complaint was made against respondent No.6 that he is not able to render his services properly owing to his age. Even otherwise, respondent No.6 is a young man of about 32 years ag