Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

RANJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 13497/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RANJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13497-2026 Date of Decision : 04.05.2026 RANJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER ........Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocate with Mr. Sarthak Soni, Advocate for respondent No.5. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners argues that vide Notification dated 19.12.2025, certain areas were included within the Municipal Council, Ajnala but, before the said area could be delimited, the prohibition imposed by the Government of India to freeze the boundaries w.e.f. 01.01.2026 came into being hence, the petitioners, who are residing in the area which was brought within the Municipal Council, Ajnala, are neither part of the Municipal Council, Ajnala for the purpose of the forthcoming elections nor will they be treated as falling within the area of the concerned Gram Panchayat hence, the respondents be directed to decide the issue whether the area, which was sought to be included w