Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

RANJEET SINGH ALIAS JOGI vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 6717/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RANJEET SINGH ALIAS JOGI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-6717-2026 (O&M) 1 218 2026:PHHC:084368 Bean IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6717-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 27.05.2026 RANJEET SINGH ALIAS JOGI «+s PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA «+e RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Aman Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. This is the first petition under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 of Cr.P.C) for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 183 dated 19.06.2025 under Section 15-C of NDPS Act 1985 (section 27-A of NDPS Act 1985 was added later on) registered at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad, Haryana. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was arrayed as an accused in the instant FIR solely on the basis of the disclosure statement made by co-accused Subhash Chand, from whose possession, the alleged contraband i.e. 66 kg 20 grams of poppy husk, was recovered. He further submits that no recovery whatsoever has been POONAM NEGI