RAMZAN ALIAS SAHIL CHAUDHARY vs STATE OF PUNJAB

127+257 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2368-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:12.05.2026 Ramzan @ Sahil Chaudhary …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: None for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner to assist the Court. Even today, no learned counsel has appeared to assist the Court on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was granted the concession of interim bail on 19.01.2026 and despite specific directions, the petitioner has not joined the investigation as stated by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Gurjant Singh. 3. It seems that the petitioner is not interest in pursuing the present petition. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s), disposed of, accordingly. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 12.05.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.05.12 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh