Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

RAMESH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 3301/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAMESH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.3301 of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 ***** CRM-M No.3301 of 2026 Date of decision : 4.5.2026 Date of uploading : 5.5.2026 Ramesh ………….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Mohit Pilania, Advocate, for Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior DAG, Haryana --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 26.2.2026, the following order was passed: ‘Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.733 dated 10.11.2025 registered under Sections 21(b), 21(B), 27-A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station HTM Hisar, District Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused, namely, Seema @ Kali, who happens to be wife of the petitioner. He further submits that disclosure statement has no evedentiary value in the eyes of law. He has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court i