Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

RAMESH vs SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
COCP 443/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAMESH
Respondent
SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

COCP-443-2026 (O&M) -1- 231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-443-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 Ramesh ......Petitioner Vs. Sh. Satbir Singh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Jeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.2. Mr. Ashish Pandey, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 6. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 12.08.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Charkhi Dadri, whereby, respondents/defendants No.1, 2 and 4 were restrained from interfering in the possession of the petitioner/plaintiff over the disputed vehicle. 2. A perusal of the case file shows that the appropriate remedy available to the petitioner is to move an application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC before learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Charkhi Dadri. Despite VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.29 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-443-2026 (O&M) -2- the availability of the