RAMESH CHAND BANSAL vs UT CHANDIGARH AND ANR

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 275 CRM-M-45029-2017 (O&M). Date of Decision: 12.05.2026. RAMESH CHAND BANSAL ... Petitioner(s) Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Vishavjeet, Advocate, for Mr. Tanvir S. Grewal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Shubham Mangla, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh, for the respondents. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Seeking quashing of the FIR bearing No.317 dated 09.09.2017, under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Sector 36, Chandigarh, along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, the instant petition has been filed. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous since the cancellation report has already been submitted by the police. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. The parties, however, shall be at liberty to take all the pleas available to them at an appropriate stage in accordance with law. May 12, 2026. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) RAJ KUMAR ARORA raj arora JUDGE 2026.05.13 16