RAMANDEEP KAUR vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 243 CWP-33234-2024 Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 Ramandeep Kaur …Petitioner Versus Union of India & others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - None for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Arun Jindal, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondents No.2 to 4. Mr. Samay Sandhawalia, Advocate, for respondent No.3. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to grant compensation to her and her siblings, who have lost their mother due to acid attack. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that claimed amount stands awarded, thus, petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. In view of statement of learned counsel for respondent No.3, petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within 3 months, if cause survives. 14.05.2026 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) Vimal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.14 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.