Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-15

RAMAN GOYAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 20186/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAMAN GOYAL
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-20186-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 CRM-M-20186-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.05.2026 RAMAN GOYAL ......PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Thind, DAG, Punjab. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. CRM-15922-2026 Allowed as prayed for. Main case 1. This petition for bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. This petition has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.0228 dated 03.10.2025 for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station Sadar Ludhiana. 2. Briefly stating the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.16 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-20186-2026 (O&M) this case came into being at the instance of ‘Amit Kumar Sharma’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by the above-named complainant that he was having business dealings with the petitioner and in the abo