RAM SWAROOP vs SUNIL

248 pee 2026:PHHC:071432 on IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-3179-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 RAM SWAROOP ...... Petitioner(s) Versus SUNIL ..... Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. Tarundeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana. oko ok N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that a demand draft of %40,000/- was ordered to be deposited by the petitioner with the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and the same may be handed over to the respondent as the petitioner has expired. 2. The prayer made by learned counsel for the respondent appears to be fair and genuine. 3. Demand draft of 740,000/-, which was deposited by the petitioner with the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, in terms of order dated 11.10.2017, is ordered to be released to the respondent against receipt and after proper verification. SUNIL 2026.05.08 11:24 | attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRR-3179-2017 (O&M) -2- 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has expired and the present petition has be