Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

RAM SHARAN vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 31938/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAM SHARAN
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.31938 of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CRM-M No.31938 of 2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 Ram Sharan ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. Eeshan Garg, Advocate, for the complainant. ---- MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR mentioned below:- FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 121 31.12.2024 Cyber Crime, District 419, 420 and 120-B of Palwal IPC MANJU 2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a 2026.05.29 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order /judgment Chandigarh CRM-M No.31938 of 2026 -2- complaint lodged by the complainant Sapna Jindal alleging that she had been duped of an amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- by some persons who had made calls to her and had told her that her insurance policy had lapsed. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings were initia