Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

RAM PARTAP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
RSA 2292/2000
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAM PARTAP SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2292-2000 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.05.2026 RAM PARTAP SINGH ..Appellant Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab. SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing i.e. 21.04.2026, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant and as per the report of registry sole appellant has expired. 2. Registry was directed to issue notice to the counsel for the appellant. 3. As per the report of registry, notice issued to learned counsel for the appellant has been received back served. 4. Despite service, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. 5. Hence, this Court is left with no other choice but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. 6. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 7. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. May 07th, 2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub/Sahil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No MOHD AYUB Whether reportable : Yes/No 2026.05.07 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.