RAM PARSAD AND ANOTHER vs VIJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS

FAO-6013-2019 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (358) FAO-6013-2019 (O&M) Date of decision:- 05.05.2026 Ram Parsad and another ...Appellants Versus Vijay Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Sansar Kundu, Advocate, for the appellants. Ms. Tanu Bhatia, Advocate, for Mr. Nigam K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. The married son and married daughter have challenged the award dated 02.07.2019 vide which the claim petition was dismissed. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANTS 2. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that in the present case, issue no.1 was decided in favour of the appellants and under issue no.2, the sole ground given for non-grant of compensation was that the present appellants were the married son and married daughter of the NARESH KUMAR 2026.05.07 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement FAO-6013-2019 (O&M) -2- deceased and thus, were not entitled to compensation. It is submitted that the Tribunal had relied upon a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case titled as “Manjuri Bera Versus Or