RAM KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

279 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17651-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 05.05.2026 RAM KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Amit Khari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Singh, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.6 to 8 and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Reply by way of an affidavit of Rajat Gulia, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar-II, has been filed, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3-State, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised with the private respondents. In view of the statements given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. (MANDEEP PANNU) 05.05.2026 JUDGE himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HIMANSHU 2026.05.06 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document