RAM KUMAR vs HY.ST.

RSA-3638-1999 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3638-1999 (O&M) RAM KUMAR ......Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. .....Respondents Reserved on : 12.05.2026 Pronounced on: 15.05.2026 Uploaded on: 27.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate Mr. Anuj Mahla, Advocate Mr. Jaswant Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. 1. The present regular second appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 20.04.1999 passed by District Judge, Jind whereby, appeal filed by the respondent against judgment and decree dated 29.08.1996 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jind was partly allowed. 2. Brief facts of the case as per pleadings in the civil suit are that appellant filed civil suit for declaration challenging order dated 31.01.1991 and 20.03.1990 passed by the respondents. As per pleadings in the civil suit, appellant was Conductor in Haryana Roadways, Jind. He was chargesheeted under Rule 7 of Haryana Civil Services