RAM KISHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

156-7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4073-2026 DECIDED ON: 25.05.2026 RAM KISHAN .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: None for the petitioner Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to regularized the services of the petitioner from 1995 i.e. from the date when the petitioner completed 2 years contractual service from the date of his appointment on contractual basis i.e. 07.12.1995 as respondent No. 3 vide order dated 24.07.2025 (Annexure P-8) has regularized the services of similar situated employee, who are juniors to the petitioner and working in the same depot w.e.f. the date of completion of 2 years contractual service, further, issuance of direction to grant all other consequential benefits. The case has been called twice, but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In the light of above, the inference can be drawn that the petitioner doES no