RAM GOVIND VERMA vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4995-2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2026 Ram Govind Verma ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana. KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing, i.e.10.03.2026, when no one was present on behalf of the petitioner, Court notice was ordered to be issued to him, for today. As per office report, notice issued to the petitioner has been received back unserved with a report that no such person was found residing at the given address. 2. This Court has already made earnest efforts to secure presence of the petitioner, but to no avail. In such circumstances, it is not feasible to adjudicate the matter. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to get this petition revived by moving an apt motion/application, if the cause of action still survives. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE 18.05.2026 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.19 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and authe