RAM DITTA vs PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR

146 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2107-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 Ram Ditta ......Appellant Vs. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation ......Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as his counsel for the date fixed. 2. As per the office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back duly served and learned counsel for the appellant has been informed through a letter. 3. Despite service, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 4. In view of the above, this Court is now left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 13.05.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.21 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity o