Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-08

RAM AVTAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 18062/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAM AVTAR AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-18062-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18062-2026 Date of decision 08.05.2026. RAM AVTAR AND OTHERS ...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Kunal Phogat, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH. J. CRM-14347-2026 Allowed as prayed for. Main case 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the ‘Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’, hereinafter being referred to as “BNSS”. The petitioners who are aggrieved of the order dated 28.07.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rohtak, duly affirmed in a revision petition by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Rohtak vide, order dated 19.12.2025, have preferred the present petition. 2. The above-mentioned orders have been issued in the backdrop of the fact that at the instance of ‘Raj Bala’, hereinafter being referred to as VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.09 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-18062-2026 -2- complainant only, the FIR for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323, 506, 307 and 326 of Indian Penal Code