Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

RAKESH KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 16626/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAKESH KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16626-2026 DECIDED ON: 25.05.2026 RAKESH KUMAR .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Abhishek K. Premi, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the respondent No.2/Appellate Authority to decide and dispose of the Statutory Appeal filed under Rule 9 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 1987 (now Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 2016 pending since 24.03.2023. At the outset, learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Raja Shekhar Vindru, Additional Chief Secretary, Transport Department, assures the Court that pending appeal of the petitioner dated 24.03.2023 (Annexure P-12) will be decided within a period of one month. In the light of above, learned counsel for the petitioner do not wish to press the instant petition any further at this stage. Accordingly, the same is disposed off at this stage. (SANDEEP M