Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

RAJWINDER SINGH BHALLA vs GUNJAN BANSAL AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CR 4338/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJWINDER SINGH BHALLA
Respondent
GUNJAN BANSAL AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CR-4338-2026 Date of decision :22.05.2026 RAJWINDER SINGH BHALLA ... PETITIONER VERSUS GUNJAN BANSAL AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, a third party, assailing the impugned order dated 25.03.2026 (Annexure P-7) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jalandhar, whereby the application filed by the petitioner- applicant under Order I Rule 10 CPC, 1908 seeking impleadment of petitioner as defendant No. 2 was dismissed. 2. Admittedly, respondent No. 1-plaintiff had instituted a suit for permanent injunction against respondent No. 2-Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar, seeking to restrain respondent No. 2-Municipal Corporation from sealing or demolishing any part of the property in possession of the plaintiff at 569-570, New Jawahar Nagar Market, Jalandhar as shown in site plan attached with plaint. MANOJ KUMAR 3. In the said suit, the