Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

RAJWATI AND ANOTHER vs RAKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 6485/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJWATI AND ANOTHER
Respondent
RAKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-6485-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 FAO-6485-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2026 Rajwati & Another ...Appellant(s) Vs. Rakesh Kumar & Others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- None. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-23122-CII-2025 This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1269 days in filing the appeal. It is mentioned in Para 2 of the present application that:- “2. That the delay is filing in appeal is occurred due to the fact that the appellant was not aware about the Law of Limitation and appellant no. 1 was under the impression that delay days start from date of receiving the awarded amount.” The above-said reason given by the applicants/appellants is vague and cryptic. Even if, for the sake of argument above reason of the applicant is believed, even then nothing has been mentioned as to on which date the appellants had received the compensation amount. The above cited SUNENA 2026.05.07 12:54 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-6485-2025 reason does not constitute sufficient cause to condone extraordinary delay of 1269 days in filing the present appeal. As such,