Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

RAJU @ RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 27708/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJU @ RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 220 CRM-M-27708-2026 Date of decision: 21.05.2026 RAJU @ RAJ KUMAR ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Sourabh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant first petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 209 dated 17.11.2025, registered under Section(s) 115, 190, 191(2), 308(4), 324(4) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 115(2), 310(2), 324(3), 324(5), 324(6), 61(2), 238(b) of BNS, 2023 were added and Section 115, 190, 191(2) of BNS, 2023 were deleted later on) at Police Station Nangal Chaudhri, District Mahendergarh. 2. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that on 16.11.2025 at about 8:00 P.M., two Bolero vehicles, without registration number plates, arrived at Sirohi Bihali Toll Plaza from the side of Nangal Chaudhary. It is alleged that approximately 14 to 15 young persons alighted from the said VISHAL SHARMA 2026.0