RAJU AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 112 CRWP-4705-2026 (O&M). Date of Decision: 19.05.2026. Raju and another ....Petitioners. VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH --- Present: Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pawan Kumar Jhanda, Senior DAG, Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) By filing present petition, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner No.1-Raju, aged 19 years and petitioner No.2-DhanmataRobidas, aged 19 years, seek necessary protection of their lives and personal liberty in view of the fact that they are living in a live-in relationship and are under eminent threats at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5. 2. Noticing that petitioner No.2 is resident of State of Assam, following was recorded on 22.04.2026:- “i) xxx ii) It is noticed that Petitioner No. 2-DhanmataRobidas, is a resident of Assam. Her parents, i.e., Respondents No. 4 and 5, are also residents of the Assam. iii) Respondent/State is directed to ascertain how Petitioner No. 2 came into contact with Petitioner No. 1, who is residing in District Fatehabad, Haryana. Credentials of both the pet