Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

RAJROOP vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 8313/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJROOP
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8313-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 21.05.2026 Rajroop … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Kulbir Singh Sekhon, Advocate, for respondent No.6. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to take immediate and effective step on his complaint dated 26.07.2025 and 15.12.2025. 2. The petitioner claims that he was registered owner of vehicle bearing Registration No. HR-26-DC-2683, make Skoda Rapid, Engine No. CWX130987, Chassis No. TMBBUCNA5GG012582. The respondent No.6 purchased said vehicle from him and took possession. A purchase declaration dated 19.06.2025 was duly executed by respondent No.6. As per purchase settlement, the petitioner applied for No Objection Certificate in the office of Sub Divisional Officer (Civil)-cum-Registering Authority, Gurugram which was duly issued on 27.06.2025. The respondent No.6 is RAJAN