RAJNISH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP-5736-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (131) CRWP-5736-2026 Date of Decision : May 18, 2026 Rajnish .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Anu Pal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed for directing the respondents to grant parole to the petitioner so as to enable him to perform the necessary tasks as required and to enable him to meet his family members but the said claim is not being decided by the respondents, which is causing prejudice to him. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Ms. Anu Pal, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent- State. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that in case any application for the grant of parole has been filed by the petitioner and the same is pending consideration with the authorities, appropriate order on the said application will be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of c