Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

RAJNI SHARMA vs SURINDER KUMAR AND ORS.

Citation / case number
CR 1816/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJNI SHARMA
Respondent
SURINDER KUMAR AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CR-1816-2026 Date of decision:06.05.2026 RAJNI ...PETITIONER VERSUS SURINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Rahul Gautam, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Verma, Advocate, Mr. Aman Mehta, Advocate and Mr. Shubham Chaudhary, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate with Mr. Hement Kumar, Advocate for respondents. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioner-plaintiff being aggrieved by order dated 20.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagahdari, Yamuna Nagar, whereby her application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed and by order dated 15.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar, whereby first appeal preferred by petitioner -plaintiff was also dismissed. 2. Notice of motion. Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 3. The simple case of petitioner-plaintiff is that she is owner in possession of suit